Skip to content

C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope : perhaps video will kill the direct laryngoscope star?

This article published online. Free full text downloadable from publisher website and link below ( right down the bottom)

This study consistent with previous similar studies in elective anaesthesia settings. Better views with VL but slower intubation times cw DL. However no failed intubations with VL cw some failed tubes with DL. My advice : train with both techniques. DL will cover most intubations with VL allowing a few more otherwise not achievable with DL.

Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Oct 2. [Epub ahead of print]

Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: A randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways.

Serocki GNeumann TScharf EDörges VCavus E.

Source

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University-Hospital Schleswig-Holstein UKSH, – serocki@anaesthesie.uni-kiel.de.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Recently, indirect videolaryngoscopes have become increasingly important devices in difficult airway management. The aim of the present study was to investigate laryngoscopic view and intubation success using the new C-MAC® D-Blade in comparison to the established GlideScope® videolaryngoscope and conventional direct laryngoscopy in a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS:

Ninety-six adult patients with expected difficult airways undergoing elective ear, nose and throat surgery (ENT) requiring general anaesthesia were investigated. Repeated laryngoscopy was performed using a conventional direct Macintosh laryngoscope (DL), C-MAC D-Blade (DB) and GlideScope (GS) in a randomized sequence before patients were intubated with the last device used.

RESULTS:

Both videolaryngoscopes showed significantly better C/L (Cormack-Lehane) classes than DL. Insufficient laryngoscopic view, defined as C/L A III, was experienced in 18 patients (19.2 %) with DL, in two patients with GS (2.1 %) and in none with DB (0%). Time to best achievable laryngoscopic view did not differ between devices. Intubation time was significantly longer with both videolaryngoscopes (Median [Range] DB: 18 [8-33] s, and GS: 19 [9-34] s) than with DL (11 [5-26] s). However, intubation success was 100 % for both DB and GS, whereas four patients could not be intubated using conventional direct laryngoscopy.

CONCLUSION:

Compared to direct Macintosh laryngoscopy, both C-MAC® D-Blade and GlideScope® comparably resulted in an improved view of the glottic opening with successful tracheal intubation in all patients.

PMID:

 23032922

[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Free Full text below
GLidescope vs CMAC vs DL Minerva Anestesiologica 2012
One Comment Post a comment
  1. This study looked at a less interesting population than critical care, ED or prehospital where the patient context is much less well controlled and the outcome stakes are possibly higher. For instance, would you tolerate the (marginally) longer intubation time in a septic obese patient who starts hypoxic and desaturates rapidly or should you opt for the (relative) certainty of a successful intubation?

    November 16, 2012

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Collective

A Hive Mind for Prehospital and Retrieval Med

Bits & Bumps

Obstetrics and Gynaecology FOAM

FOAMcast

Why FOAM it alone?

Prehospital and retrieval medicine blog

DrGDH

Or "How I'm Learning to Stop Worrying and Love Emergency Medicine"

rain0021

A great WordPress.com site

Genevieve's anthology

Writings to amuse, teach, inspire and entertain.

Prehospital and retrieval medicine blog

Prehospital and retrieval medicine blog

Keeweedoc

A topnotch WordPress.com site

BoringEM

Bringing the boring to emergency medicine

resusNautics

Navigating resuscitation

Doctor's bag

by Dr Edwin Kruys

Prehospital and retrieval medicine blog

Prehospital and retrieval medicine blog

ETM Course

Emergency Trauma Management Course

The Doctor's Dilemma

Modern Medical Musings from Dr Marlene Pearce

Sim and Choppers

A blog combining medical education, simulation and helicopter retrieval medicine

GreenGP

Reflections of a Rural GP

Auckland HEMS

Unofficial site for prehospital care providers of the Auckland HEMS service

Rural Doctors Net

useful resources for rural clinicians

expensivecare

Searching for the big picture in intensive care

Nomadic GP

Adventures of a Rural Locum

AmboFOAM

Free Open Access Medical Education for Paramedics

the short coat

Prehospital and retrieval medicine blog

BoringEM

Bringing the Boring to EM

Keep Caring

When your shift turns to shit? Keep moving, keep caring!

Kangaroo Island doctor blogging about Rural Medicine in Australia

thebluntdissection

pulling apart cases from the ED...

Little Medic

Learning everything I can from everywhere I can. This is my little blog to keep track of new things medical, paramedical and pre-hospital from a student's perspective.

MEDEST

Prehospital Emergency Medicine

ruralflyingdoc

Just another WordPress.com site

MDaware.org

Prehospital and retrieval medicine blog

Intensive Care Network

Prehospital and retrieval medicine blog

Broome Docs

Rural Generalist Doctors Education

Resus M.E!

Prehospital and retrieval medicine blog

EMCrit Blog - Emergency Department Critical Care

Online Medical Education on Emergency Department (ED) Critical Care, Trauma, and Resuscitation

St Emlyns

Meducation in Virchester #FOAMed

Emergency medicine and critical care medical education blog

RFDS Australia - Queensland Section The STAR Program

Specialised Training in Aeromedical Retrieval

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,421 other followers

%d bloggers like this: