Comparison of Success Rates between Two Video Laryngoscope Systems Used in a Prehospital Clinical Trial

ok first here is the article abstract Comparison
of Success Rates between Two Video Laryngoscope Systems Used in a
Prehospital Clinical Trial Take home messages

1. Both VL systems did no better than traditional DL when
   historical data reviewed in this prehospital system
2. King Vision did worse than CMAC, mainly due to screen
   failures due to disconnections of handle from screen
3. Supraglottic airway and BVM techniques were used to
   rescue both DL and VL failures so important to maintain
   comprehensive skills