Great Melbourne workshop in ultrasound guided nerve blocks and vascular access. You will be doing more of this in the prehospital and retrieval setting, if not ALREADY!
In memory of Dr John Hinds
Great Melbourne workshop in ultrasound guided nerve blocks and vascular access. You will be doing more of this in the prehospital and retrieval setting, if not ALREADY!

Continue reading “Resuscitation Flash teams on the end of the phone”

Continue reading “So you want to be an Outback Retrieval Doctor?”

Continue reading “Seconds from disaster – avoiding the airway clean kill”
The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2013 annual report for this blog.
Here’s an excerpt:
The Louvre Museum has 8.5 million visitors per year. This blog was viewed about 210,000 times in 2013. If it were an exhibit at the Louvre Museum, it would take about 9 days for that many people to see it.

Continue reading “Thoughts and prayers with PHARM colleagues in Norway”
“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results”. Albert Einstein.
You could be right in thinking that “safety crusaders” are the glass half empty type, right? Those that believe “what can go wrong, will go wrong” (Murphys Law).
I’m not a pessimist, but I do believe in being prepared for the potential for error, or for when things do genuinely go wrong. We need to avoid Einstein’s insanity; repeating that same thing and expecting different results the next time (as the next time might be a catastrophic outcome). As HEMS clinicians we have a responsibility to get our patients from the pre-hospital to the hospital environment without harm, to the best of our abilities. A culture of safety and forethought, identifying and mitigating for potential hazards (threat and error management) is a prominent facet of our work.
Both Aviation and medicine involve…
View original post 824 more words
In the September 2013 edition of the British Medical Journal, Robyn Clay-Williams has published a thought provoking article on the modelling of clinical risk management on civil aviation practices, and questions whether a military aviation model may be more prudent when assessing and managing risk in the healthcare environment. The abstract can be found HERE.
The author questions the appropriateness of translating sometimes rigid civil aviation processes (and a zero tolerance for risk) into healthcare, as some healthcare systems (such as emergency departments and intensive care units) need more flexibility and autonomy in their workings and risk management. She suggests managing risk in high stakes clinical environments such as these would be more conducive to a military aviation model – the parallels being teams with limited resources who deal routinely with unpredictable situations, complex and time critical operations (as would happen frequently in the pre-hospital environment or the ED…
View original post 172 more words
I’m currently away in Japan getting some skiing in, so I’m not up to much I terms of posting.
However, whilst waiting for my wife to return from a shopping rampage in Tokyo, I did catch this post over at the brilliant ScanCrit site about HEMS use of RSI in East Anglia.
It adds to the belief that I have long held: prehospital intubation is not bad if it is done well; it’s prehospital intubation done poorly that is bad.
While you are over at ScanCrit, check out the rest of the site, these guys (and gals?) post some excellent stuff.
You must be logged in to post a comment.